This discourse opens with an explicit exploration of the two schools of thought that have come to chart the course of Ugbo and Ifee-Yoruba historiography and are pivotal to unravel Ugbo-Ooni of Ife controversy. It also attempts a critical assessment of facts from existing literatures on Ugbo, Yorùbá history and oral account of both palaces in the pre-Odùduwà era.
The aboriginals or earliest dwellers of Ile-Ife {Ule-Ufe in Ilaje dialect} have been the kernel of controversy between the Olugbo of Ugbo Kingdom and Ooni of Ìfe. Both monarchs present conflicting viewpoints which x-ray innate understanding. Thus, this antiquated controversy till date is devoid of agreement between the monarchs and their people which paves way for a witty dialogue in the academic community.
Since this controversy is of antiquity, and may lingers on unabated. This study therefore explores the two views/schools of thought appertaining to this controversy, and critically examines facts from antiquity. The study notes that scholars have made tremendous strides through varied and robust publications to unmask the mysticism surrounding Obatala and Oduduwa’s personalities and have tried to lay to rest the Olugbo-Ooni’s controversy. These researches have been useful but non-conclusive. However, this study concludes that availability of evidence to enhance Yoruba historiography are essential hormones of objectivity.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Assessment of Facts on the Ugbo-Ìfẹ́ Controversy.
3. Conclusion
Research Objectives and Themes
This study aims to critically analyze the historical controversy surrounding the origins of Ile-Ife, specifically examining the conflicting narratives between the Ugbó Kingdom and the Oọ̀ni of Ìfẹ́ to determine the validity of claims regarding the earliest inhabitants and progenitorship in Yoruba historiography.
- Exploration of the Pre-Odùduwà/Ugbó school of thought regarding ancestral origins.
- Critical examination of the Ìfẹ́-Odùduwà narrative and its historical implications.
- Assessment of ethnographic and linguistic evidence supporting the Ugbó as aboriginal dwellers.
- Investigation into the sociopolitical evolution of early Yoruba institutions and the role of the Ugbó people.
Excerpt from the Book
Pre-Odùduwà regime of Ugbó View and Ìfẹ́-Odùduwà View on Yorùbá Origin
The less popular view to this controversy is the Pre- Odùduwà/Ugbó view, while the more popular view is the Ìfẹ́ - Odùduwà view on Yorùbá ancestral origin.
The pre- Odùduwà/Ugbo view has it that, before the coming of Odùduwà and his people to Ìfẹ́, there were already autochthonous people there. These were the famous Ugbó people, whose warriors were mentioned in Ìfẹ́ folklores. The Ugbó mentioned in these folklores is not the Igbo people of Eastern Nigeria, rather they are the Ìlàje people who today occupy the Atlantic coastline of Ondo State of Nigeria and are a distinguished, distinct and linguistic sub-group of the Yoruba people. The Ugbó people evolved an ancient centralized government led by their rulers. The dynasty which they established ruled for a long time, producing many kings. Some of the names of their kings have survived in oral traditions and most widely remembered was Kutukutu Oba Ugbó.
Ugbó kingdom flourished in politics, religion, economic and social activities. The nation was believed to have reached its peak in the reign of Ekenwa in the early centuries of the first millennium A.D. Thereafter, the nation was plagued with many problems amongst them being weak rulers and an epidemic that took many lives including those of reigning kings and many members of the royal family. As a result, the ruling family could not produce an adult candidate for the throne. An interregnum occurred, during which a regency was established pending the adulthood of the heir (Ọbàtálá). All these developments brought weakness to the Ugbó nation. Unfortunately, Ọbàtálá proved a weakling when installed as king and was unable to revitalize the nation. It was at this point, Odùduwà who was said to be watching events as they unfolded from his home base of Oramfe Hill near Ile-Ife where he met the Ugbó people launched an attack on the Ugbó people in Ile-Ife between 800-1000 AD.
Summary of Chapters
Introduction: This chapter introduces the two competing schools of thought regarding Yoruba historiography and sets the stage for a critical assessment of the Ugbó-Ọọ̀ni controversy.
Assessment of Facts on the Ugbo-Ìfẹ́ Controversy.: This section evaluates oral traditions, ethnographic data, and linguistic evidence to challenge the dominant Odùduwà-centric narrative and support the claim of the Ugbó as the aboriginal settlers of Ile-Ife.
Conclusion: The final chapter summarizes the findings, noting that the suppression of the pre-Odùduwà era hinders an objective historical understanding and calls for a collaborative, empirical review of Yoruba origins.
Keywords
Antiquity, controversy, mysticism, Ugbó, Ìlàje, Ìfẹ́, progenitorship, Yoruba, historiography, Odùduwà, Obalúfẹ̀, autochthonous, archaeology, linguistics, ethnography
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the central focus of this research?
The research focuses on the historical controversy between the Ugbó Kingdom and the Oọ̀ni of Ìfẹ́, specifically concerning who the earliest inhabitants of Ile-Ife were and the legitimacy of the Odùduwà progenitorship narrative.
What are the primary themes discussed in the work?
Key themes include the Pre-Odùduwà Ugbó history, the socio-cultural and linguistic links between the Ugbó and Ìfẹ́ peoples, the role of Ọbàtálá in early governance, and the impact of mythology on historical objectivity.
What is the primary goal of the study?
The primary goal is to provide a critical assessment of existing literature to unmask the mysticism surrounding Yoruba origins and to argue for the historical visibility of the Ugbó people as aborigines.
Which scientific methods are utilized in this work?
The author employs a historiographical review, analyzing oral traditions, comparative dialectology, archaeological findings (such as radiocarbon dating), and secondary sources to cross-examine historical claims.
What topics are covered in the main body of the text?
The main body examines the Pre-Odùduwà era, the Moremi legend, the transition of power from Ọbàtálá to Odùduwà, and the broader debate regarding the definition of "Yoruba" identity.
How would you characterize this work using keywords?
The work is best characterized by terms such as Antiquity, Yoruba historiography, Ugbó, Ìfẹ́, mythology, progenitorship, and socio-political evolution.
Why does the author argue that the Ugbó are the aborigines of Ìfẹ́?
The author cites oral traditions, linguistic evidence showing 85% cognate correspondence between Ugbó-Ilaje and Ìfẹ́ dialects, and archaeological pointers to centralized political structures existing long before the Odùduwà arrival.
What does the author suggest to resolve the historical controversy?
The author recommends that the current monarchs establish an Independent History Research Scheme and convene a conference of historians, anthropologists, and archaeologists to subject historical notes to critical scrutiny.
How does the author interpret the legend of Ọbàtálá?
The author views the narratives of Ọbàtálá as a "drunkard" or "weakling" with skepticism, suggesting these accounts were potentially fabricated or promoted by the succeeding political elite to justify the takeover by the Odùduwà dynasty.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Bababo Ikuemonisan (Autor:in), 2020, The Kingdoms "Olugbo of Ugbo" and "Ooni of Ife". A Controversy of Manipulation of History or a Fact From Antiquity, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.hausarbeiten.de/document/915234
