This essay provides an analysis of the many hurdles in the process of truly harmonised international auditing standards. The method of analysis for this essay included a review of the current literature available in libraries and on the internet.
The cultural barriers are regarded as the most difficult to overcome since they comprise of people’s behaviours as well as languages. Further, it is stated that the translation process is one of the major hurdles since words in different languages are not equivalent to the English ones. Moreover, cultural diversity may also cause a general resistance as the standards are dictated by big audit firms. Additionally, the IFAC is mainly influenced by the USA and the EU which might continue to cast a damning light on the ISA.
Alternatively, the level of education and the lack of professional auditing bodies in some developing countries embody the social problems. The political hurdles contain the pride of sovereignty and the political system of countries. Additionally, governments are reluctant to abandon their right to prescribe the standards for professions. Furthermore, it will also be difficult to find a majority in the national parliaments because current national standard-setters or representatives from businesses might exert pressure on the members of parliament to reject ISA.
On the other hand, differences in national legislation as well as in the legal system are the main part of legal obstacles. Nowadays, a marked distinction can be drawn between the common law which is predominant in Anglo-Saxon countries and the codified law which is applied in many European continental countries. Beyond this, differences in the effectiveness of countries legal structure and national regulations like auditors’ liability, accounting rules also adversely impair the harmonisation process.
Lastly, the economic hurdles are characterised by different user orientation of financial statements and the stages of technological developments. Further, auditors in developed countries need other standards as their counterparts in developing countries due to the growth of e-commerce and e-business.
Finally, it is concluded that truly harmonised standards may not be feasible because of the many differences between countries. It seems more important to achieve a minimum set of international auditing standards as unitary standards generate many benefits.
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Introduction & Background
3. Problems of Harmonisation
3.1 Cultural Obstacles
3.2 Social Obstacles
3.3 Political Obstacles
3.4 Legal Obstacles
3.5 Economic Obstacles
4. Conclusion
Objectives and Core Themes
This paper critically examines the challenges associated with achieving a truly harmonized set of international auditing standards. It investigates why, despite the existence of global frameworks, significant hurdles persist that prevent uniform implementation across diverse national contexts.
- The impact of cultural diversity and linguistic barriers on standard interpretation.
- Social and educational prerequisites for effective implementation in developing nations.
- Political sovereignty concerns and the role of national regulatory bodies.
- The friction between common law and codified legal systems in auditing practices.
- Economic disparities and the influence of technological development on audit methodologies.
Excerpt from the Book
3.1 Cultural Obstacles
Cultural differences are the most critical and most difficult barrier to overcome, as they are concerned with people’s behaviours, religions, attitudes, values as well as languages. Many respected authorities among others Hofstede and Trompenaar researched and classified different cultural behaviours in the past. They emphasises that people’s behaviours and views are simply different from each other due to their diverse cultural influences. By considering ISA 220 in this context, which requires safeguards to guarantee auditor independence, it seems complicated to specify the degree of necessary independence. For example, in Latin America, Asia and southern Europe personal relations are of uppermost importance and gift-giving is widely-used in business life.
Whereas, in North America and northern Europe auditors are expected to eclipse close personal relationships and to reject any gifts in business (Groeschl and Doherty, 2000). Moreover, people’s diverse values and manners describe how things are done and how each international standard is interpreted.
One the other hand, according to Parker (1998), approximately 6000 different languages are spoken globally. Translating the real meaning of the English ISA in all languages is a major challenge since words in different languages are not equivalent to the English ones. Translators might regularly face problems as exact expert terms do not have equivalents in the target language. Additionally, the different interpretations of standards and key terms in the translation process are one of the main sources of inconsistency between countries. Indeed, incorrectly translated standards cause serious misunderstandings as well as confusions and hamper the process of auditing harmonisation.
Summary of Chapters
1. Executive Summary: Provides an overview of the analysis regarding the hurdles in international auditing harmonization, covering cultural, social, political, legal, and economic dimensions.
2. Introduction & Background: Outlines the history of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and the development of International Standards on Auditing (ISA).
3. Problems of Harmonisation: Investigates the five major barriers—cultural, social, political, legal, and economic—that impede the convergence of global auditing standards.
4. Conclusion: Summarizes findings by suggesting that while absolute harmonization may be unrealistic, a minimum set of unified standards remains essential for global audit quality and market integrity.
Keywords
International Auditing, ISA, Harmonisation, Convergence, Cultural Obstacles, Social Barriers, Political Sovereignty, Legal Systems, Economic Hurdles, IFAC, Audit Independence, Standardization, Accounting Regulation, Globalisation, Professional Standards.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core focus of this paper?
This paper critically discusses the challenges and hurdles involved in the quest for international auditing harmonization, identifying why achieving uniform standards remains a complex task.
What are the primary thematic areas explored?
The study focuses on five main problem areas: cultural differences, social infrastructure, political sovereignty, variations in legal systems, and economic and technological disparities.
What is the primary objective of this research?
The main objective is to evaluate why, despite the existence of the International Standards on Auditing (ISA), total harmonization across countries has not yet been achieved and what factors contribute to this resistance.
Which methodology is applied?
The research is based on a comprehensive review of existing literature, including academic research, professional studies, and documentation sourced from libraries and online repositories.
What does the main body cover?
The main body provides a detailed breakdown of the five identified obstacles, analyzing how language, education levels, national pride, divergent legal frameworks, and technological advancements act as barriers to standardized auditing.
Which keywords best describe the paper?
Key terms include International Auditing, Harmonisation, ISA, Convergence, Cultural and Legal Obstacles, and Globalisation.
How does cultural diversity affect the interpretation of audit standards?
Cultural diversity affects how auditors behave and interpret rules; for instance, differing views on professional relationships and gift-giving in business can complicate the application of standards like ISA 220.
Why is the translation of international standards considered a hurdle?
Because many expert terms in English lack direct equivalents in other languages, literal translations can lead to misunderstandings, inconsistent applications, and confusion regarding the intended meaning of the standards.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Stefan Bode (Autor:in), 2007, The problems of international auditing harmonisation, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.hausarbeiten.de/document/70049
