On the 9th of February the Swiss population decided with a slight majority of 50,3% to limit immigration into their country. Due to this development, the political system “direct democracy” is discussed more critically in Switzerland and also in Germany and other countries. Because of the decision of the Swiss population to limit immigration into the country, more and more people point out that direct democracy is not an efficient political system to further the prosperity of the inhabitants. Furthermore, according to many critics, the decision to limit immigration has extremely negative effects on the economy of Switzerland.
According to their election programs, more and more German political parties like to integrate more direct democracy into the existant system of representative democracy in Germany. For example “Die Linke”, the “SPD” or new political parties like the “AfD” are proponents of more direct democracy in Germany. Therefore, this essay will look at a number of arguments in favour of direct democracy.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Abstract
- Definition of direct democracy
- Critic of the economy
- Lack of knowledge
- Connection between direct democracy and prosperity
- Institutional effects on happiness
- Conclusion
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This term paper explores the implications of the Swiss popular initiative “Against mass immigration” for the political system of direct democracy. The paper examines the potential economic consequences of limiting immigration, specifically focusing on the impact on Swiss businesses and the broader economic landscape. It also explores the relationship between direct democracy and prosperity, considering the arguments for and against the system's effectiveness in promoting economic growth and citizen well-being.
- The impact of the Swiss popular initiative "Against mass immigration" on direct democracy
- The economic implications of limiting immigration
- The relationship between direct democracy and prosperity
- The arguments for and against the effectiveness of direct democracy
- The potential consequences for Swiss businesses and the economy
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
- Abstract: Provides an overview of the Swiss initiative against mass immigration and its implications for the political system of direct democracy. Highlights the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of direct democracy, particularly regarding its impact on economic prosperity.
- Definition of direct democracy: Defines the term "direct democracy" and its different forms, emphasizing the Swiss model where citizens directly vote on laws and policies.
- Critic of the economy: Examines the concerns of the business sector regarding the initiative against mass immigration. The chapter analyzes the potential negative impact on the Swiss economy, particularly for sectors like the building industry and export companies.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
This term paper focuses on the Swiss political system, direct democracy, immigration policy, economic impact, prosperity, and the potential consequences of the initiative "Against mass immigration." The paper analyzes the relationship between direct democracy and economic growth, considering the arguments for and against the effectiveness of the system in promoting prosperity.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Anonym (Autor:in), 2014, Swiss Popular Initiative "Against Mass Immigration". Arguments for Direct Democracy, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.hausarbeiten.de/document/364434
