The course describes the topics of tacit knowledge, the introduction to the area of Skill and Technology, makes distinctions between rules and the following of rules, between the abstract and the concrete, and problems and dilemmas in society from the perspective of professional skill.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Based on the Preface and Chapter 1 in „The Practical Intellect“ by Bo Göranzon (2009)
Based on Chapter 2 in „The Practical Intellect“ by Bo Göranzon (2009)
Based on “Tacit knowledge and risks“ by Bo Göranzon (2007)
Based on “The dream of the exact language”“ by Bo Göranzon (1993)
Based on “Literature, Language and Learning: Turing’s Paradox and the Metaphor of Caliban” by Bo Göranzon (2009)
Based on “Is the Computer a Tool?” by Bo Göranzon (2009)
How the introduction of formal systems may eventually limit the field of view in a skill
What does professional knowledge consist of?
What is the purpose of a computer?
Certainty and dialogue
Conclusion
Objectives and Topics
The primary objective of this work is to explore the intersection of professional skill, technology, and tacit knowledge through a reflective analysis of Bo Göranzon's theories. The author investigates how formal systems and computerization influence human decision-making, the limitations of algorithmic thinking in professional practice, and the necessity of maintaining a critical approach toward digital tools.
- The role and definition of tacit vs. theoretical knowledge.
- Distinctions between human intellect and computer processing capabilities.
- The impact of formal systems on professional field of view and creativity.
- Importance of dialogue, judgment, and experience in skill development.
- Multidisciplinary collaboration and the challenge of translating domain-specific languages.
Excerpt from the Book
Based on “Tacit knowledge and risks“ by Bo Göranzon (2007)
The article describes three different kinds of knowledge: the theoretical knowledge, experience based knowledge and tacit knowledge. All of them play an integral part in our live. Only by acknowledging all of them can we be successful in what we do and progress.
There are simple examples like baking a cake. The theoretical knowledge would be the knowledge acquired by reading the recipe, experienced based knowledge would be how to treat the dough in practice and the tacit knowledge might be some knowledge that we gained by observation. Without the theory we wouldn’t know how much of the ingredients we would need. Without practical knowledge we could bake a cake according to the recipe, but this might not be a tasteful cake. Our oven might be different from the recipe creator’s oven or our mixer, therefore we would need to deviate from the recipe to get a good result. The tacit knowledge would help us to know this deviation and naturally pick the right instruments to bake the cake.
The example shows how important the interaction of different kinds of knowledge is. I guess that the more experienced one grows the less important becomes the theory as consciously perceived theory. The more experienced someone becomes in a task, the more the theory fades into tacit knowledge. In the cake example this can be that the baker will no longer need the recipe, but knows it by heart. Sometimes theory does not work as proposed in practice and needs adaption which also leads to the perception that theory becomes less relevant in the process of application. However it is much needed as a starting point and rule book when uncertainty leaves us indecisive. Rosseau claims that theory only makes sense with the backup of experience and creates chaos otherwise. This can be translated to that a recipe is not understandable if there is no knowledge of measurement units or ingredients. Theory presumes some experience we can relate to as much as experience presumes theoretical and tacit knowledge. All three kinds of knowledge interlink like a cogwheel and cannot work to its highest potential when isolated.
Summary of Chapters
Introduction: Provides an overview of the seminar “Skills and Technology” and sets the stage for the reflective academic papers based on Bo Göranzon’s work.
Based on the Preface and Chapter 1 in „The Practical Intellect“ by Bo Göranzon (2009): Reflects on the role of technology in society and the initial friction when introducing new computer systems into work processes.
Based on Chapter 2 in „The Practical Intellect“ by Bo Göranzon (2009): Discusses human resistance to technology and the distinction between the computer as a tool versus a replacement for the human mind.
Based on “Tacit knowledge and risks“ by Bo Göranzon (2007): Examines the interplay between theoretical, experience-based, and tacit knowledge using the analogy of a baker.
Based on “The dream of the exact language”“ by Bo Göranzon (1993): Explores the limits of formal, exact languages and the necessity of interpretation and judgment in human communication.
Based on “Literature, Language and Learning: Turing’s Paradox and the Metaphor of Caliban” by Bo Göranzon (2009): Highlights the differences between arts and science and why machines cannot replicate human emotion or relational interaction.
Based on “Is the Computer a Tool?” by Bo Göranzon (2009): Details the experience of multidisciplinary teamwork and the challenge of bridging different professional languages.
How the introduction of formal systems may eventually limit the field of view in a skill: An integrative essay section addressing professional knowledge, the purpose of computers, and the role of dialogue.
Conclusion: Summarizes that formal systems limit the human view only when used blindly, emphasizing that critical thinking is the most essential skill in a technology-driven world.
Keywords
Tacit knowledge, professional skill, computerization, formal systems, theoretical knowledge, critical thinking, human-computer interaction, professional judgment, multidisciplinary teams, digital tools, experience-based knowledge, technology in society, skill development, reflective practice, artificial intelligence.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the fundamental focus of this work?
The work focuses on the reflective analysis of how professional skills and human knowledge are influenced by the implementation of computers and formal systems in work environments.
What are the central thematic fields covered in the text?
The key themes include the distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge, the limitations of algorithmic logic, the importance of human judgment, and the challenges of multidisciplinary communication.
What is the primary research goal of the author?
The author aims to investigate whether formal systems restrict the professional field of view and to advocate for a balanced, critical usage of computer tools in professional practice.
Which scientific method is applied in this documentation?
The author uses a reflective, qualitative approach, basing personal insights and academic arguments on the close reading and chronological study of Bo Göranzon's texts.
What is covered in the main body of the document?
The main body comprises a series of reflections on specific chapters and articles by Göranzon, focusing on practical experiences from student project work to illustrate theoretical points.
Which keywords best characterize this analysis?
The most descriptive keywords are tacit knowledge, professional judgment, human-computer interaction, critical thinking, and formal systems.
How does the author characterize the difference between human and machine interaction?
The author emphasizes that machines are processors of data, while humans are interactors who possess emotions, social skills, and the capability to make judgments that go beyond predefined rules.
What specific challenge does the author identify regarding 3D software and modeling?
The author notes that software can limit creativity because users may focus more on satisfying the software's input requirements than on the original creative vision, leading to potential loss of nuance, such as in the tactile simulation of fabric.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Anna Lena Bischoff (Autor:in), 2016, Tacit and theoretical knowledge in skill development, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.hausarbeiten.de/document/336940
