The use of fieldwork is considered to be fundamental part of anthropological research, with many different methodologies being utilised depending on one’s theoretical stance. This essay will look to compare two different anthropologists’ approaches – that of Bronisław Malinowski’s (1922) work in New Guinea and Susan Krieger’s (1996) work in America. Through giving a general definition of fieldwork first, the two anthropologists’ methodologies will be outlined and contrasted. It is found that while there are certain similarities between both approaches, with each having their own distinctive strengths, the differences can be accounted for by historical environments and the goals of the anthropologist.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Participant Observation in Anthropology
3. Bronisław Malinowski’s Methodological Approach
3.1 Statistical Documentation by Concrete Evidence
3.2 Active Participation and Immersion
3.3 Integration and Tabularisation
4. Susan Krieger’s Methodological Approach
4.1 The Reengagement Process: Separating Out
4.2 Introspection and Interpretive Analysis
5. Critical Comparison of Methodologies
6. Conclusion
Research Objectives and Core Themes
The primary objective of this essay is to critically compare two distinct anthropological methodologies—those of Bronisław Malinowski and Susan Krieger—to understand how theoretical stances and historical contexts shape the fieldwork process.
- The historical evolution of anthropological fieldwork practices.
- Scientific versus interpretive approaches to ethnographic research.
- The role of researcher bias, introspection, and personal identity.
- The impact of socio-political environments on methodological choices.
- Structural-functionalist perspectives versus feminist and reflexive methodologies.
Excerpt from the Publication
The Evolution of Fieldwork in Anthropology: A Critical Examination Between Two Different Methodological Approaches
The use of fieldwork is considered to be fundamental part of anthropological research, with many different methodologies being utilised depending on one’s theoretical stance. This essay will look to compare two different anthropologists’ approaches – that of Bronisław Malinowski’s (1922) work in New Guinea and Susan Krieger’s (1996) work in America. Through giving a general definition of fieldwork first, the two anthropologists’ methodologies will be outlined and contrasted. It is found that while there are certain similarities between both approaches, with each having their own distinctive strengths, the differences can be accounted for by historical environments and the goals of the anthropologist.
In an anthropological sense, participant observation is a structured and qualitative research approach that involves immersion into a society for the purpose of gaining an in-depth understanding from the point of the native, of how it is actually like to live in that community (Dewalt & Dewalt, 2002, p. 2-3). Corbetta (2003, p. 236) describes participant observation as when a researcher enters a “direct process for a relatively long period of time into a given social group, in its natural setting, establishing a relationship of personal interaction with its members, in order to describe their actions and understand their motivations, through a process of identification”. The methods used to obtain information include structured and non-structured interviews, note-taking, and questionnaires, with emphasis being placed on gathering first-hand information.
Chapter Summaries
1. Introduction: Outlines the significance of fieldwork in anthropology and introduces the comparative study between Malinowski’s and Krieger’s distinct methodologies.
2. Participant Observation in Anthropology: Defines the core concepts of participant observation as a research tool for gaining an in-depth understanding of social groups.
3. Bronisław Malinowski’s Methodological Approach: Details Malinowski’s reliance on scientific, objective methods, statistical documentation, and his structural-functionalist view of society.
4. Susan Krieger’s Methodological Approach: Explores Krieger’s reflexive, feminist approach, focusing on her "separating out" process to account for researcher bias and introspection.
5. Critical Comparison of Methodologies: Contrasts the two anthropologists regarding their research goals, the scope of their studies, and the influence of historical context on their work.
6. Conclusion: Summarizes that both approaches offer unique strengths and that methodologies are inherently tied to the researcher's objectives and their specific historical period.
Keywords
Anthropology, Fieldwork, Participant Observation, Bronisław Malinowski, Susan Krieger, Ethnography, Methodology, Structural-Functionalism, Reflexivity, Introspection, Qualitative Research, Research Bias, Cultural Studies, Scientific Method, Feminist Anthropology
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this essay?
The essay examines the evolution of anthropological fieldwork by critically comparing the methodological approaches of Bronisław Malinowski and Susan Krieger.
What are the central themes discussed in the paper?
The core themes include the contrast between scientific and interpretive research, the role of researcher subjectivity, historical influences on methodology, and the balance between individual action and broader social structures.
What is the main objective of the research?
The goal is to demonstrate how different theoretical stances and historical contexts lead to diverse fieldwork practices, each possessing its own set of advantages and limitations.
Which scientific methodology is central to the discussion?
The essay focuses on participant observation, analyzing how it is applied by both authors to gather in-depth data about specific cultural communities.
What does the main body of the work cover?
It covers the historical background of both researchers, the specific components of their methodologies (such as statistical documentation for Malinowski and the "separating out" process for Krieger), and a comparative critical analysis of their findings.
Which keywords best characterize this work?
Key terms include Anthropology, Participant Observation, Ethnography, Reflexivity, Research Bias, and Methodological Comparison.
How does Malinowski's "method of statistical documentation by concrete evidence" function?
It involves gathering objective facts, such as kinship tables and economic transaction logs, to provide a synoptic chart of the community's structural organization.
What is the purpose of Krieger's "separating out" process?
The process is designed to help the researcher identify and examine their own personal feelings, biases, and responses toward interviewees to ensure a more holistic and accurate representation of the collected data.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Lee Hooper (Autor:in), 2012, The Evolution of Fieldwork in Anthropology, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.hausarbeiten.de/document/262248
