What is a broadly applicable framework of the stages of social entrepreneurship (SE)? Practitioners and scholars have continued to discuss definitions, approaches, and perspectives about SE. The aim of this article is to reframe the current discussions by suggesting a framework of the five stages of SE. We use empirical studies on SE across the United States, Bangladesh, Japan, Cambodia, and India to identify the effectiveness of this framework. We propose a "systemic problem" that would facilitate us to reframe and progress current discussions of SE. This article provides a more solid basis for identifying the concept and the definition of SE. It gives ample room for future researchers to utilize our work. The originality of this article is to reframe current discussions of SE by introducing the five stages of SE, including the systemic problem and Theory of Change (ToC).
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Introduction
- Theoretical Framework
- Debate on Definitions
- Debate on Approaches
- Debate on Perspectives
- Debate on Theory of Change (ToC)
- The Five Stages of Social Entrepreneurship
- Definitions of the Five Stages
- Case Studies
- Results
- Conclusions
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
The main objective of this working paper is to propose a framework of five stages of social entrepreneurship (SE), addressing the ongoing debates surrounding its definition, approaches, and perspectives. The paper uses empirical studies from various countries to assess the framework's effectiveness and aims to provide a more robust foundation for understanding and defining SE, facilitating future research.
- Defining and clarifying the concept of social entrepreneurship.
- Developing a comprehensive five-stage framework for social entrepreneurship.
- Analyzing the role of systemic problems and Theory of Change (ToC) in SE.
- Examining the effectiveness of the proposed framework through empirical case studies.
- Contributing to capacity-building methodologies for SE practitioners and researchers.
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
Introduction: This introductory chapter sets the stage by highlighting the relative youth and fragility of the third sector compared to the political and economic sectors. It underscores the growing importance and expectations surrounding the third sector, particularly in addressing issues like economic inequality and human security. The chapter emphasizes the need for a stronger third sector and posits social entrepreneurship (SE) as a crucial factor in achieving this goal, motivating the need for a better understanding of SE's stages and capacity-building methodologies.
Theoretical Framework: This chapter delves into the existing debates surrounding the definition, approaches, and perspectives on social entrepreneurship. It critically examines the existing literature, highlighting the lack of a unifying framework incorporating "systemic change" and Theory of Change (ToC). This section lays the groundwork for the introduction of the five-stage framework proposed in the subsequent chapter, emphasizing the limitations of current approaches and the need for a more comprehensive understanding of SE development.
The Five Stages of Social Entrepreneurship: This central chapter presents the core argument of the paper – a five-stage framework for understanding social entrepreneurship. It defines each stage, illustrating their application through case studies, and presents the results of this empirical analysis. The chapter emphasizes how embedding systemic problems, Theory of Change, capacity building, and systemic change into the stages of SE reframes the current debates. The case studies and empirical analysis provide evidence for the utility of this new framework.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
Social entrepreneurship, systemic problem, theory of change, systemic change, third sector, capacity building, social enterprise, case studies, empirical research, human security, economic inequality.
Frequently Asked Questions: A Comprehensive Language Preview of Social Entrepreneurship
What is the main objective of this working paper?
The primary objective is to propose a five-stage framework for social entrepreneurship (SE), addressing ongoing debates about its definition, approaches, and perspectives. It aims to provide a more robust understanding of SE and facilitate future research by using empirical studies to assess the framework's effectiveness.
What are the key themes explored in this working paper?
Key themes include defining and clarifying the concept of social entrepreneurship, developing a comprehensive five-stage framework, analyzing the role of systemic problems and Theory of Change (ToC), examining the framework's effectiveness through case studies, and contributing to capacity-building methodologies for SE practitioners and researchers.
What are the five stages of social entrepreneurship outlined in the paper?
The paper details a five-stage framework for understanding social entrepreneurship. While the specific details of each stage are described in the full text, the framework incorporates systemic problems, Theory of Change, capacity building, and systemic change to reframe existing debates. Case studies and empirical analysis support the utility of this new framework.
What is the significance of the theoretical framework presented?
The theoretical framework critically examines existing debates surrounding the definition, approaches, and perspectives on social entrepreneurship. It highlights the lack of a unifying framework incorporating "systemic change" and Theory of Change (ToC) and lays the groundwork for the proposed five-stage model.
What kind of empirical evidence is used to support the five-stage framework?
The paper utilizes empirical studies from various countries to assess the effectiveness of the proposed five-stage framework. Case studies are presented to illustrate the application of each stage and provide evidence for the framework's utility.
What is the role of Theory of Change (ToC) in the paper's framework?
Theory of Change plays a crucial role in the five-stage framework. The paper emphasizes the importance of incorporating ToC into the understanding and development of social entrepreneurship, highlighting its contribution to creating systemic change.
What is the significance of the "systemic problem" concept in this paper?
The paper emphasizes the importance of understanding and addressing "systemic problems" within the context of social entrepreneurship. The five-stage framework is designed to integrate this perspective, providing a more comprehensive approach to understanding SE development.
Who is the intended audience for this working paper?
This working paper is intended for social entrepreneurship practitioners, researchers, and anyone interested in gaining a deeper understanding of social entrepreneurship, its development stages, and effective capacity-building methodologies.
What are the key words associated with this working paper?
Key words include: Social entrepreneurship, systemic problem, theory of change, systemic change, third sector, capacity building, social enterprise, case studies, empirical research, human security, economic inequality.
What is the overall conclusion of the paper?
The paper concludes by presenting a refined understanding of social entrepreneurship through a proposed five-stage framework. This framework is supported by empirical evidence and aims to provide a more robust foundation for understanding and defining SE, ultimately contributing to better capacity building and systemic change.
- Quote paper
- Yutaka Tanabe (Author), 2020, The Five Stages of Social Entrepreneurship. What is a broadly applicable framework?, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.hausarbeiten.de/document/531887
