The issue of boundary and dual relationship has been a major subject of concern in psychological practice. Ethics complaints on dual relationship and boundary crossing continue to rise both in nature and variety. This paper examined and shed light on the complexities of dual relationship and boundary crossing in clinical psychology and explain the pertinent moral and clinical worries that clinical psychologist's face daily in their practice. The paper analysed three underlying themes: 1) using an empirical review of relevant literature to identify clinician’s attitudes toward risky and useful dual relationship and boundary crossing, 2) learn whether involving in dual relationships, negatively or positively influences therapeutic outcome, 3) using the decision making model to address the concept, challenges and variances associated with dual relationship in clinical psychology. Lastly, the paper comes up with strategies that help psychologists to make flawless ethical standards and offer moral guidance. Finally, study shows that, though, dual relationships sometimes enhanced therapy, aids the treatment strategy, and promotes the clinician-client working relationship; it also weakens the treatment process, hampers the clinician-client cooperation, and brings instant or lasting damage to the service user.
Key Words: Boundary crossing, dual relationship, ethical decision making,
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Abstract
- Key Words
- Introduction
- Purpose
- Methodology
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This paper explores the complexities of dual relationships and boundary crossing in clinical psychology, examining the ethical and clinical concerns that practitioners face. It aims to understand how these concepts influence decision-making processes and differentiate between risky boundary violations, useful boundary crossings, and inevitable or caring dual relationships.
- Examining clinician attitudes towards risky and useful dual relationships and boundary crossing
- Investigating the impact of dual relationships on therapeutic outcomes, both positive and negative
- Applying a decision-making model to address the challenges and variations associated with dual relationships in clinical psychology
- Developing strategies to ensure ethical standards and provide moral guidance regarding dual relationships
- Analyzing empirical literature to gain insights into the complexities of dual relationships and boundary crossing in clinical psychology
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
- Abstract: This section provides a concise overview of the paper's focus, highlighting the significance of dual relationships and boundary crossing in clinical psychology practice. It outlines the paper's objectives, including an empirical review of relevant literature, an analysis of the impact of dual relationships on therapeutic outcomes, and the development of strategies for ethical decision-making in this context.
- Introduction: The introduction establishes the importance of the topic by discussing the prevalence and ethical complexities of dual relationships and boundary crossing in clinical psychology. It highlights the challenges practitioners face in navigating professional boundaries and the potential risks associated with these relationships.
- Purpose: This section clarifies the paper's specific aims and objectives. It outlines the intent to examine the complexities of dual relationships and boundary crossing, analyze the ethical and clinical concerns, and explore the impact of these concepts on decision-making processes.
- Methodology: The methodology section describes the research approach used in the paper. It details the process of reviewing empirical literature, including the search terms, databases used, and criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
The paper focuses on the key concepts of boundary crossing, dual relationships, ethical decision-making, and clinical psychology practice. It investigates the complexities of these issues, the potential risks and benefits associated with dual relationships, and the ethical guidelines that inform decision-making in this context.
- Quote paper
- Olusegun Emmanuel Afolabi (Author), 2014, Dual Relationships and Boundary crossing. A Critical Issues in Clinical Psychology Practice, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.hausarbeiten.de/document/282950
