An external test or public examination, particularly in a second/foreign language such as IELTS, TOEFL, HSC examination in English, etc might have considerable impact on the stakeholders including teachers, learners, parents, administrators, the institution, the educational system and society as a whole. The effect a test has on the different components of the educational process of a second/foreign language is termed ‘washback, either beneficial or harmful at both the micro and macro level. The current paper, firstly, purports to be an appraisal of the concept of ‘washback’, secondly, examines its nature and functions as revealed by different proponents and researchers, and, finally, ascertains its role in second/foreign language education.
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. WASHBACK
2.1 Background and Origin
2.2 Definition
2.3 Classification
2.4 Positive Washback
2.5 Negative Washback
2.6 Washback Hypotheses
3. AREAS AFFECTED BY WASHBACK
4. REDUCING NEGATIVE WASHBACK AND PROMOTING POSITIVE WASHBACK
5. CONCLUSION
Objectives & Key Themes
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive appraisal of the concept of "washback" in second and foreign language education, examining its nature, functions, and the various factors that influence its manifestation. It explores the role of external testing and how it shapes the behaviors and motivations of key stakeholders within the educational system.
- Theoretical appraisal of the "washback" concept in applied linguistics.
- Distinction between micro and macro levels of washback effects.
- Analysis of the relationship between testing, curriculum, and teaching methodologies.
- Strategies for minimizing negative washback and maximizing positive outcomes.
- Identification of stakeholders impacted by standardized examination systems.
Auszug aus dem Buch
Positive Washback
Positive washback is said to result when a testing procedure encourages good teaching practice, for example, an oral proficiency test being introduced with the expectation that it will promote the teaching of speaking skills, and reflects the skills and abilities that are taught in the course. Therefore, when there is a match between the activities used in learning the language and the activities involved in preparing for the test, we say that the test has positive washback. We can use this positive washback to influence the language syllabus and curriculum.
Positive washback can be summarized as: (a) Teachers and learners will be motivated to fulfill their teaching and learning goals (Anderson & Wall, 1993); (b) Positive washback takes place when tests induce teachers to cover their subjects more thoroughly, making them complete their syllabi within the prescribed time limits; (c) Good tests can be utilized and designed as beneficial teaching-learning activities so as to encourage a positive teaching-learning process (Pearson, 1988); (d) A creative and innovative test can quite advantageously result in a syllabus alteration or a new syllabus (Davis, 1990); (e) Examinations achieve the goals of teaching and learning, such as the introduction of new textbooks and new curricula (Cheng, 2005); (f) Tests motivate students to work harder to have a sense of accomplishment and thus enhance learning; and (g) Decision makers use the authority power of high-stakes testing to achieve the goals of teaching and learning, such as the introduction of new textbooks and new curricula.
Summary of Chapters
1. INTRODUCTION: Outlines the role of external examinations as tools for evaluation and selection and introduces the phenomenon of "washback" as the influence these tests have on classroom practice.
2. WASHBACK: Defines the core concept, its historical background, and categorizes its effects into positive and negative types, supported by various academic perspectives and hypotheses.
3. AREAS AFFECTED BY WASHBACK: Discusses the wider impact of testing beyond the classroom, including societal effects and the diverse stakeholders involved in the testing process.
4. REDUCING NEGATIVE WASHBACK AND PROMOTING POSITIVE WASHBACK: Offers practical strategies—categorized into design, content, logistical, and interpretation—to foster beneficial educational outcomes.
5. CONCLUSION: Synthesizes the review, emphasizing that while washback is an inevitable consequence of testing, it can be steered to enhance learning through strategic design and policy decisions.
Keywords
washback, language testing, educational assessment, stakeholders, positive washback, negative washback, curriculum alignment, washback hypotheses, teaching motivation, assessment policy, classroom impact, second language acquisition, foreign language education, test design, systemic validity.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core subject of this paper?
The paper primarily investigates the concept of "washback" in the context of second and foreign language education, focusing on how standardized tests influence teaching, learning, and educational systems.
What are the central thematic fields discussed?
Key themes include the definition and origin of washback, the distinction between positive and negative effects on classroom behavior, the role of stakeholders, and strategies for improving test design to better support learning objectives.
What is the primary research goal?
The study aims to appraise the concept of washback, examine its functions as identified by researchers, and determine how educators and policymakers can mitigate negative impacts while promoting beneficial ones.
Which scientific methods were applied?
The paper employs a comprehensive literature review and theoretical analysis, synthesizing findings from decades of research in applied linguistics and language testing to build its arguments.
What aspects are covered in the main body?
The main body covers the historical development of public examinations, detailed definitions and classifications of washback, the presentation of Alderson and Wall’s washback hypotheses, and actionable strategies for test reform.
Which terms characterize this research?
The work is characterized by terms such as systemic validity, communicative paradigm, micro and macro level impact, and the dichotomy between test-driven learning and learning-driven testing.
How does the author define negative washback?
Negative washback is defined as a scenario where a test's narrow content or rigid format constrains the teaching and learning environment, leading to a "teaching to the test" culture that neglects broader educational goals.
What role do stakeholders play in washback?
Stakeholders, including teachers, learners, parents, and administrators, are influenced by test results in their attitudes and motivations; the author argues that these groups should be involved in the testing process to ensure that necessary pedagogical changes are implemented effectively.
- Quote paper
- Prof. Dr. M Maniruzzaman (Author), 2014, Washback of Second/Foreign Language Tests. An Appraisal, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.hausarbeiten.de/document/278338
