Globalisation and standardised products

  List of contents  

I.  Introduction  1

II.  Critical view of the Concept of Standardisation and Globalisation  1

2.1  The Standardisation concept by Levitt  2

2.2  Globalisation and global strategies  3

2.3  Globalisation and Homogenisation  5

III.  Culture and Globalisation  5

3.1  The Global Culture  5

3.2  Glocalisation: Towards positive globalisation  6

IV.  Summary and Conclusions  7

V.  Bibliography  8

II

I. Introduction

The products, services, and brands of transnational companies of mainly North American origin are flooding almost every part of the world. The so-called “McDonaldisation” transforms different national economies into one global, interdependent market (Ritzer, 2003). McDonald, Coca-Cola and Levi are compelling symbols of the North American lifestyle, representing modernity, convenience and enjoyment. They have enormous influence across political, ethnic, and social boundaries. This combination of ideological appeals, symbolic values, and product quality imply the power these companies maintain in their brands and products, which impact cultures in various contexts (Gajender et al., 2001).

But does economic integration mean also cultural integration? It is possible that long existing and diverse nations, with different histories and cultures, tastes, behaviours and ideas change within a short period of time and fit into the market structure of big companies? The aim of this brief essay i s to discuss critically the fundamental background of this question and its key implications.

II. Critical view of the Concept of Standardisation and Globalisation

The concept of standardisation was mainly influenced by the Professor Theodore Levitt (1983) with its Harvard Business Review article “The Globalization of the Markets” which caused since its publication a great debate about this topic. In the further section, the main ideas of his concept will be analysed critically.

2.1 The Standardisation concept by Levitt

The theorist Levitt (1983) put his focus on marketing of standardised products and brands world wide as

1. Customer needs and interests are becoming increasingly homogenous worldwide.

2. People around the world are willing to sacrifice preferences in product features, functions, design, and the like for lower prices at high quality.

3. Substantial economies of scale in production and marketing can be achieved through supplying global markets.

1

His three perceptions which have been followed by many industries over the last twenty years are criticised.

Referring the first point, global segments with homogenous customer interests and response pattern may be identified in some product markets, but there is substantial evidence for diversity of behaviour within countries, and the emergence of countryspecific segments (Czinkota and Ronkainen, 2004). This leads to the conclusion stated by Halliburton and Hünerberg (1993, p.91):

“It is not whether to go global, but for which product/market, at what time, with which aspect of the marketing operation, and to which extent.”

For example products like steel, chemicals, agricultural equipment, and technology intensive industries tend to be less culturally grounded than consumer goods. Moreover, luxury goods have a higher degree of standardisation than food (Czinkota and Ronkainen, 2004).

An implication identified by Kotler (2003) is that companies should focus on similarities and adapt elements of the product like promotion or packaging if necessary (figure 1 - here only European market).

Figure 1: Level of strategic decision making for marketing (in %)

Source: Schlieper (1994)

2